Call toll free:

Developing an Evaluation Plan and Disseminating Evidence

Developing an Evaluation Plan

Introduction

An evaluation plan is a document which outlines the objectives of the evaluation. The plan also states the questions that the evaluation answers, together with the information that answers these questions. The evaluation plan’s base is the information that a certain researcher will collect from the necessary respondents. The plan states the procedures and practices in detail, to carry out the evaluation process successfully. Furthermore, the plan explains using an example of the evaluation of a new staffing matrix in hospitals, affecting nursing staff and the hospital population in general. In the evaluation of a proposed new staffing matrix, the paper sets out different methods in order to evaluate its effectiveness.

Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness

The methods used in evaluating the effectiveness of an evaluation plan are in such a way that they can show if the plan achieves its objectives. The objectives of the solution are to improve nursing staff satisfaction and positively impact overall delivery of care. In order to evaluate successfully the proposal’s effectiveness, the methods should show that there is satisfaction from the above objectives. First, the plan should outline the sources of information before the proposal, in this case to show the dissatisfaction of the nursing staff which led to the proposal of the solution. It should also show the dissatisfaction of the participants after the initiation of the solution. The methods should also compare the turnover rates before and after the initiation of the project. It should also show the positive impacts of the solution on all the participants.

Variables in Assessment

These are the considerations in the evaluation plan to show the effects of the initiation of the solution. These variables deal with the outcome of the solution, and outline the questions that the evaluation plan seeks to answer. The variables set out the type of information that is required to assess the proposal or the solution. The variables used in the assessment determine the type of methods used in collecting feedback from the respective parties. The variables will also affect the tools used in the evaluation and the education of participants. For example, the variables in this case will be the attitudes and perceptions of the staff and patients before and after the initiation of change. The rate of nursing staff turnover is also crucial variable in the assessment to evaluate the solution.

Tools to Educate Project Participants

These are the tools used to pass information about planning and implementation issues of the program to the participants. Their main aim is to reach each and every participant and obtain relevant information from them. They also educate the participants on the relevance of the evaluation process. These tools differ with the type of participants the evaluation. They also differ depending on the type of information that each participant has to give. The people who should undertake the teaching process should have the relevant information about the evaluation plan and its implementation process. The teaching material that is used in the teaching process should be organized in such a way that it fits the relevant participants. In the evaluation plan in order to assess the effectiveness of a new matrix for the nursing staff, teaching should be available for both the nursing staff and patients. For the nursing staff, the evaluators can pass flyers and pamphlets with the relevant information. The printed material should analyze the importance of undertaking the evaluation process and the expectations of the nursing staff in the process. They can also involve posters and seminars for the staff, where they can use Power Point slides or other audio-visual methods. For the patients, the evaluators can pass the information verbally from one patient to another. They can also use print material for both the inpatients and outpatients.

Assessment Tools to Evaluate Project Outcomes

These are the tools used to get information from the participants about the outcomes of the solution. They involve setting up the evaluation questions and coming up with methods to obtain the information successfully. In the evaluation of project outcomes, there is an assessment of both the attainment of objectives and the impact of the plan on the participants. In assessing the attainment of objectives, the plan can carry out a monitoring system, scaling the objective attainment or survey of each member’s satisfaction with the results. In assessing the impact of the plan on the participants, a questionnaire can be used. Moreover, the participants can fill the questionnaires by themselves or interviewed verbally depending on their situation. The questions in the questionnaires tend to determine how much and what kind of difference the solution has made to the participants, who are the targets of it. It seeks to determine the satisfaction of the participants, and any negative impacts of the solution. The assessment can also be a survey of satisfaction with the results, or member survey of satisfaction with the objectives.

Conclusion

An effective evaluation plan should give guidelines on the process of evaluation. It also helps determine what information the evaluators require, and different ways to obtain it in order to avoid a waste of time. The plan also assist in coming up with the timeline and strategies in gathering information, moreover improves the evaluator’s initiative. The above essay gives the major considerations of developing an evaluation plan, with relevant examples.

Disseminating Evidence

Introduction

Disseminating evidence is the distribution of information and results derived from a project to certain health stakeholders and to the greater audience. The intention is to spread relevant knowledge and evidence-based information. Research on dissemination addresses how data about health promotion and care interference are packaged, created, interpreted , and transmitted among a variety of essential stakeholder groups.

Strategies for Disseminating Results of Project to Key Stakeholders

These are strategies that explain how the outputs’ and outcomes’ visibility of the project can be maximized. Also, they outline how the results of the project will be shared with the relevant individuals, institutions as well as organizations and other stakeholders. The project planners should prepare the dissemination strategies in consultation with other project partners. The strategies should include what the plan is disseminating, that is the message in the plan. They should also outline the target audience, and the purpose of dissemination. The methods and time of dissemination should also be part of the dissemination strategies.

The methods of dissemination should differ according to the target audience. One of the main methods of dissemination is publication. This is the most common method since one can alter the language according to the audience. Publications also add the visibility to the project. To present the project, the planners can use collaborative events. Therefore, this involves presenting related projects in one meeting, which helps save time and financial resources of organizing single events for each project. Other methods include websites and sending e-mails.

Strategy for Disseminating Significance of Project Outcomes to Greater Nursing Community

The major strategy for disseminating project outcomes is the use of nursing journals and other research conferences. These conferences enhance effective communication of research results between clinicians and researchers. They can also use newsletters and seminars. The nurses who conduct research can arrange poster sessions and other research agency programs in order to share information and enhance continuity and interest of it. The other way to disseminate research outcomes is through the use of clinical practice guidelines. These are statements that are systematically developed to help physicians, as well as patients in decision making during certain circumstances. These guidelines help to improve the quality of healthcare. The final strategy is use of the internet. This is by both posting research findings on known clinical and health websites as well as sending emails.

Conclusion

This essay describes the strategies for disseminating results of the project to key stakeholders as well as the strategy for disseminating significance of project outcomes to greater nursing community. These are important strategies to ensure that research information is not only useful to those around the researcher but also are beneficial to a wider audience.